Page 7
1. SUMMARY OF THE MAIN RESULTS
1. www.coe.int/sport/ALLIN
2. To have an overview of all the data collected, have a look at the dynamic databases created within the framework of the ALL IN project
(www.coe.int/sport/ALLIN - section on the data collection campaign)
3. Except for Belgium where only one Olympic sport federation is national. The rest are community-based.
4. International Boxing Association (AIBA), International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), International Equestrian Federation
(FEI), International Fencing Association (FIE), International Weightlifting Federation (IWF), International Basketball Federation (FIBA),
International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation (IBSF), International Canoe Federation (ICF), International Association Football
Federation (FIFA), International Golf Federation (IGF), International Gymnastics Federation (FIG), International Handball Federation (IHF),
International Hockey Federation (FIH), International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF), International Judo Federation (IJF), International Luge
Federation (FIL), International Swimming Federation (FINA), International Ski Federation (FIS), World Rowing (FISA), International Tennis
Federation (ITF), International Table Tennis (ITTF), International Shooting Sport Federation (ISSF), International Volleyball Federation
(FIVB), Badminton World Federation (BWF), World Curling Federation (WCF), World Taekwondo (WT), World Sailing (WS), Union Cycliste
Internationale (UCI), International Biathlon Union (IBU), International Skating Union (ISU), International Modern Pentathlon Union (UIPM),
International Triathlon Union (ITU), United World Wrestling (UWW), World Archery Federation (WA), World Rugby (WR).
5. Data was collated on 31 December 2018, except the area of participation in sport, which was collated on 31 December 2017.
6. Due to the low response rate, the data from Montenegro and Bulgaria are not included in this report.
1.1 Introduction
“ALL IN: Towards gender balance in sport
1
”is a European Union (EU) and Council of Europe (COE) joint project
(1March 2018 - 31 October 2019). Its aim is to provide support to public authorities and sport organisations when
designing and implementing policies and programmes to address gender inequalities in sport and when adopting
a gender mainstreaming strategy. A part of this project is to collect data on gender equality in sport on leadership,
coaching, participation, media /communication and gender-based violence, so that progress can be monitored,
and comparisons made between countries and between sports, which will aid in the design of evidence-based
policies. The results in this report present the main ndings of the data collected
2
.
1.2 Methodology
Eighteen countries were involved in the project: Albania, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Israel, Lithuania, Montenegro, Netherlands, Portugal, Serbia and
Spain. Survey questions were submitted to the National Olympic Committees (NOCs), the ministries/government
departments responsible for sport and the national sport federations
3
aliated to the 35 international federations
recognised by the International Olympic Committee, and for which the discipline was included in the programme of the
last Olympic Games (2016/2018).
4
In some countries, there are not 35 federations (sometimes less, sometimes more).
Each country appointed a national co-ordinator who was responsible for carrying out the survey. The online
questionnaire was sent through the software program Eval&Go. The data gathering took place from March
to May of 2019.
5
Table 1 gives an overview of the total number of respondents in each country.
6
The project
had a very high response rate, 85%, and it can, therefore, be concluded that the study is representative for the
participating countries. For some: Albania; Croatia; France; Georgia; and Lithuania, the response rate was 100%.
The participants answered most of the questions, although several federations did not answer the questions about
their membership. Still, the response rate, compared to other academic studies, is very high. This, therefore, makes
the study highly representative and valid.